Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has written himself into the history books and future pub trivia questions by becoming the first prosecutor to pursue criminal charges against a former president. Whether his case against Donald Trump is successful or not, Americans nationwide are now seeing the power that local prosecutors wield, sometimes capriciously.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Manhattan D.A.’s investigation took nearly five years, and both Bragg’s predecessor and the Federal Election Commission declined to file charges on the same evidence. <\/span>Reason<\/span><\/i>‘s Jacob Sullum <\/span>wrote<\/span><\/a> in a recent breakdown of the case against Trump that Bragg is “relying on debatable facts, untested legal theories, and allegations that are tawdry but far from earthshaking.” <\/span>The New York Times<\/span><\/i> somewhat more gently <\/span>described<\/span><\/a> the meanderings of Bragg’s investigation as a “circuitous and sometimes uncertain road.”<\/span><\/p>\n

Political opponents of Trump may insist it’s the destination, not the journey, that matters, but Republicans and conservative commentators have lambasted Bragg’s decision to file charges as nakedly political abuse of prosecutorial discretion. Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis called it the “weaponization of the legal system to advance a political agenda.”<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

The weaponization of the legal system to advance a political agenda turns the rule of law on its head. <\/p>\n

It is un-American. <\/p>\n

The Soros-backed Manhattan District Attorney has consistently bent the law to downgrade felonies and to excuse criminal misconduct. Yet, now he is…<\/p>\n

— Ron DeSantis (@GovRonDeSantis) March 30, 2023<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n