Researchers at Stanford University\u2014in partnership with several nonprofits that have received government funding\u2014worked with social media platforms to flag and suppress commentary on COVID vaccines, science, and policy that contradicted public health officials’ stances, even when that commentary was true.<\/p>\n

This new information comes from yet another Twitter Files entry of screenshotted emails and reports from independent journalist Matt Taibbi that reveals the back and forth between the Stanford-led Virality Project<\/a> and receptive Twitter executives about policing alleged COVID misinformation on its platform.<\/p>\n

Beginning in February 2021, and continuing with regular reports, Virality Project researchers encouraged Twitter to expand its misinformation policies to include true reports of vaccine side effects, criticism of vaccine passport systems for their imposition on rights and freedoms, and even discussion of legitimate scientific research on breakthrough infections on natural immunity.<\/p>\n

Researchers with the project explicitly flagged “true content which might promote vaccine hesitancy,” including other countries banning certain vaccines because of their health side effects. While individual true stories about negative vaccine side effects were not treated as misinformation or disinformation, they could be labeled “malinformation” if they exaggerated or misled people, said researchers.<\/p>\n

\n

14.VP told Twitter that “true stories that could fuel hesitancy,” including things like “celebrity deaths after vaccine” or the closure of a central NY school due to reports of post-vaccine illness, should be considered "Standard Vaccine Misinformation on Your Platform." pic.twitter.com\/nOyuw2r5cH<\/a><\/p>\n

— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) March 17, 2023<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n